Legal Opinion
State v. Faraday
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 16, 2004No. SC 16827PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The state appeals, following our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the judgment of the trial court revoking the defendant’s probation. The state claims that the *176Appellate Court improperly concluded that the defendant had not violated his probation. We reverse the judgment of the Appellate Court.
The defendant, William Faraday, pleaded guilty under the Alford,1 doctrine to the crimes of sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a,2 and risk of injury to a child in violation of General Statutes § 53-21.3…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- McKune v. LileSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- United States v. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Label Systems Corp. v. Samad AghamohammadiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. D'AntonioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.