Legal Opinion

Rieger v. Kirkland

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1941No. 28068PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff, a minor, brought suit through his guardian ad litem to recover damages for personal injuries and for property destruction resulting from a collision, in which plaintiff, while riding his bicycle, was struck by an automobile, owned by defendants, and being driven at the time by defendant wife. Tried to a jury, the action resulted in a verdict in plaintiff’s favor. Judgment was entered thereon, and defendants appealed.

The accident occurred at about four o’clock in the afternoon of August 14, 1939, „ at a point, variously designated, within the right of way of a public highway known…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beck v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. American Products Co. v. VillwockWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Pierce v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Libbee v. HandyWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Pyle v. WilbertWashington Supreme Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Billingsley v. Rovig-Temple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Moen v. ChestnutWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Glick v. RopesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Greyhound Corporation v. Juanita Jean Blakley, a Minor, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Sidney W. BlakleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  5. Hynek v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API