Legal Opinion

Pyle v. Wilbert

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1940No. 27682PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

About two o’clock a. m., December 6, 1938, a Chevrolet coupe operated by J. T. Pyle, who was accompanied by his mother, collided with a Buick sedan operated by Charles Wilbert, whose guests in that automobile, which was owned by Wilbert’s parents, were two ladies and a gentleman, within the intersection of Frey a street (a nonarterial highway) and Sprague avenue, an arterial highway, in the city of Spokane. Pyle and his mother brought this action to recover against James N. Wilbert, his wife and his son, for property damage and for personal injuries sustained as a result of the accident.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hefner v. PatteeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Norton v. PayneWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Gibson v. Spokane United RailwaysWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Day v. PolleyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Hamilton v. CadwellWashington Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hauswirth v. Pom-ArleauWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Pierce v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Burghardt v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Knight v. BorganWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Lindberg v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1940

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API