Legal Opinion

Moen v. Chestnut

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1941No. 28252PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steinert, J. —

Plaintiffs brought suit to recover damages for impairment of their automobile and for personal injuries to plaintiff wife, resulting from a collision with an automobile owned by defendants. The action was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict for plaintiffs. From a judgment on the verdict, defendants appealed.

For convenience, plaintiff wife, Margaret Moen, will be referred to, in this opinion, as though she were the sole respondent, and defendant husband, Victor L. Chestnut, will be referred to as though he were the sole appellant.

The collision involved herein occurred in…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Leftridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Pierce v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Chapin v. StickelWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Lindberg v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1940

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. BresolinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. State v. HusonWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Billingsley v. Rovig-Temple Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. State v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1947

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API