Billingsley v. Rovig-Temple Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
— This is an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property resulting from an automobile collision. The cause was tried to a jury, and at the close of plaintiff’s case defendants challenged the sufficiency of the evidence and moved for a non-suit. The challenge was overruled and the motion was denied. On submission of the case to the jury, a verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff. Defendants thereafter moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and this likewise was denied. Judgment for plaintiff was then entered, and defendants appealed.
The assignments of error…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Martin v. HadenfeldtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Richardson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Pierce v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Moen v. ChestnutWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Hefner v. PatteeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Kellerher v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Shultes v. HalpinWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- French v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Williams v. HoferWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Yeager v. DunnavanWashington Supreme Court · 1946
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.