Legal Opinion

Bloomquist v. Johnson Grocery

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 16, 1933No. 29,432PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

Certiorari to review a decision of the industrial commission awarding respondent compensation.

Respondent was in the employ of Roy Johnson, conducting a grocery store at the city of Virginia, this state, under the trade name of Johnson Grocery. On June 25, 1931, at about 11 o’clock in the forenoon, respondent placed a bunch of bananas in the front window, carried the crate to the back part of the store, then seated himself at a desk to make out bills. As he was doing this work a customer came in to buy a package of cigarets. Respondent rose from his seat, and as he turned to look…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Peoples Coal & Ice Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. State ex rel. Anseth v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Moore v. J. A. McNulty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Auman v. Breckenridge Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fisher v. FisherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Dykhoff v. Xcel EnergySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Morrow v. Orscheln Bros. and Hartford A. I. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Brusven v. BallordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. AshantiDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API