Auman v. Breckenridge Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
Certiorari to review a decision of the industrial commission denying relator compensation.
The findings of the referee were in all things adopted by the commission. The pivotal finding is this:
“That while so employed said employe suffered an accidental injury to his person, but that the accident which occasioned this injury did not arise out of his employment with the above named employer.”
This finding is challenged as not justified by the evidence and. contrary to law.
The facts are not in dispute. Relator was employed as manager and wire chief of respondent Breckenridge…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Claim of Katz v. A. Kadans & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- State ex rel. Peoples Coal & Ice Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. MacKendreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Ridenour v. LewisNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Hanson v. Robitshek-Schneider Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. BruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Corcoran v. Teamsters & Chauffeurs Joint Council No. 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.