Legal Opinion

Yackey v. Pacifica Development Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1979No. Civ. 18473PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STANIFORTH, Acting P. J.

Plaintiffs George F. Yackey and Alma H. Yackey brought this action to recover money damages for breach of contract (escrow instructions) against the Pacifica Development Company (partnership) and its copartners William R. Swann and Edward Gessin.

Upon trial, the court found the release clause in the escrow agreement so uncertain as to render the entire agreement void, unenforceable and upon that sole basis gave judgment for defendants. Yackey appeals. 1

I

Mr. and Mrs. Yackey agreed to sell to the partnership 375 acres of real property located in Fallbrook,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Royer v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Handy v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Honey v. Henry's Franchise Leasing Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ehrler v. EhrlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. MCB LTD. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Stenehjem v. Kyn Jin ChoAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Askari v. R & R LAND CO.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Smith v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API