Legal Opinion

Handy v. Gordon

California Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1967No. L. A. No. 29137PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants entered after the trial court granted a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiff contends that his complaint states a cause of action for specific performance of a contract to sell land and that therefore the trial court erred in granting the defendants’ motion. (See MacIsaac v. Pozzo (1945) 26 Cal.2d 809, 815-816 [161 P.2d 449].)

The complaint alleges that on January 21, 1964, the parties entered into a written contract in which defendants agreed to sell certain real property to plaintiff. The contract was set forth in escrow…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Magna Development Co. v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Klein v. MarkarianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Burrow v. TimmsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Stockwell v. LindemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Middlebrook-Anderson Co. v. Southwest Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Miller v. Citizens Sav. & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Citizens Business Bank v. GevorgianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. MCB LTD. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API