Legal Opinion

Stenehjem v. Kyn Jin Cho

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1981No. 4964PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURKE, Justice.

Kurt Stenehjem, the prospective purchaser of a parcel of unimproved land with frontage on the new Homer by-pass road, appeals from the superior court's refusal to specifically enforce his contract with Kyn Jin Cho and Sun Shik Cho, and from the court's failure to award him damages for the Chos' refusal to complete the transaction. Judge James A. Hanson ruled that the contract should not be enforced in light of a provision requiring the Chos to subordinate the deed of trust to be given to them by Stenchjiem to any deed of trust that Stenehjem might give to an "F.D.I.C.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Moran v. HolmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Walentas v. LipperCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  3. Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Rego v. DeckerAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Gulbenkian v. GulbenkianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hall v. Add-Ventures, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Norton v. HerronAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Carter v. HoblitAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Glover v. SagerAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Young v. KellyAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API