Legal Opinion
Yates v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided June 29, 2015No. 5:12-CV-752-FLPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on motion of defendant Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”) to preclude evidence suggesting that brake dust causes pleural mesothelioma or that “every exposure counts,” (DE 380), together with motion of defendant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) to exclude testimony of plaintiffs’ experts Eugene Mark, M.D. (“Mark”) and Arnold Brody, Ph.D. (“Brody”). (DE 382). Each defendant has joined in the motion of the other, (DE 384, 385), both of which are ripe for consideration. For the reasons that follow, these motions are…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Walter Mixon Allen, Jr., Mattie Gayle Allen, Barry Lane Allen v. Pennsylvania Engineering Corp., American Sterilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Krik v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Crane Co. v. DeLisleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015
- Watkins v. Affinia GroupOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2017
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.