Legal Opinion

Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 2012No. 38 WAP 2010PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

The civil action underlying this appeal was selected as a test case for the admissibility of expert opinion evidence to the effect that each and every fiber of inhaled asbestos is a substantial contributing factor to any asbestos-related disease. The inquiry has proceeded under principles derived from Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C.Cir.1923).

I. Background

In February 2005, Charles Simikian commenced a product liability action against Allied Signal, Inc., Ford Motor Company (“collectively Appellants”), and others, asserting causes of action grounded on multiple…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. SiracusanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FreemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Krauss, C. v. Trane US Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Mitchell, L. v. E. Shikora, D.O., Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Rost, Richard, M., Exec. v. Ford Motor Co., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API