Legal Opinion
Heberling v. Day
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 31, 1922No. Civ. No. 2433PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiffs instituted actions in the superior court of Tulare County for the foreclosure of certain liens for materials furnished for and labor performed on the construction of a certain building in the city of Visalia, and also for recovery of judgments against the sureties upon the bond furnished by the contractor to the owner of the building for the faithful performance of the terms of the building contract to satisfy the several demands sued for. By order of the court the actions were consolidated. (Sec. 1195, Code Civ. Proc.)
On the third day of May, 1917, one D. B. Day, a building…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowman v. WohlkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Commercial Security Co. v. Modesto Drug Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- General Electric Co. v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Schwarz & Gottlieb, Inc. v. MarcuseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gary C. Tanko Well Drilling, Inc. v. DoddsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Talco Capital Corp. v. State Underground Parking Commn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Fontana Paving, Inc. v. Hedley Brothers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Ingersoll v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.