Hammond Lumber Co. v. Richardson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BEAUMONT, J., pro tem.
This is an action for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien upon real property in the city of Los Angeles. S. N. Reiss, defendant, owner of the property upon which the lien was claimed, entered into a contract with the Richardson Building & Engineering Co., Inc., a corporation, for the erection of a building. The plaintiff Hammond Lumber Company furnished the materials which were used in the construction of the building. Not being paid for such materials, plaintiff within the statutory time recorded a claim of lien, and subsequently brought this action. Plaintiff had…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Osborn v. LogusOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Monterey County v. CushingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Tibbetts v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Eberle v. DrennanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Putnam v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lori, Ltd. v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Peccole v. Luce & Goodfellow, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1949
- Wand Corp. v. San Gabriel Valley Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Ingersoll v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932