Legal Opinion

Ingersoll v. Chaplin

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1932No. Docket No. 424PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an action to foreclose separate mechanics’ liens upon property situated in the town of Encinitas in San Diego County. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, and the defendants, Sidney Chaplin, Minnie Chaplin and Lallie de Loriere are here on appeal.

The liens state that Sidney Chaplin was the owner and reputed owner of the premises upon which ‘ the liens were claimed. The complaint alleges, and the court found, that Sidney Chaplin and Minnie Chaplin, as husband and wife, were the owners of the property. This creates no sufficient variance affecting the validity of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Osborn v. LogusOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Tibbetts v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Eberle v. DrennanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Putnam v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  5. Jewell v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Wand Corp. v. San Gabriel Valley Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Brown Co. v. Appellate DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API