Legal Opinion

Fontana Paving, Inc. v. Hedley Brothers, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 11, 1995No. F022447PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THAXTER, J.

We hold here that a mechanic’s lien claim recorded more than 90 days after completion of the work of improvement is ineffective notwithstanding a later filed notice of completion which erroneously recites a completion date postdating the claim of lien. As we read the applicable statutes, 1 a valid notice of completion serves to shorten the lien-claim filing period. An invalid notice of completion has no legal effect, although it may furnish a factual basis for estopping a statute of limitations defense. Because there was no evidence supporting estoppel here, we will reverse…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Lentz v. McMahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Nolte v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Borchers Bros. v. Buckeye Incubator Co.California Supreme Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. DEPARTMENT OF INDUS. REL. v. Fidelity Roof Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Showplace Square Loft Co. v. Primecore Mortgage Trust, Inc. (In Re Showplace Square Loft Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2003
  3. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. CarawayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. L.A. Unified School Dist. v. Torres Construction Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Los Angeles Unified etc. v. Torres Construction CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API