Fontana Paving, Inc. v. Hedley Brothers, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THAXTER, J.
We hold here that a mechanic’s lien claim recorded more than 90 days after completion of the work of improvement is ineffective notwithstanding a later filed notice of completion which erroneously recites a completion date postdating the claim of lien. As we read the applicable statutes, 1 a valid notice of completion serves to shorten the lien-claim filing period. An invalid notice of completion has no legal effect, although it may furnish a factual basis for estopping a statute of limitations defense. Because there was no evidence supporting estoppel here, we will reverse…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Lentz v. McMahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Nolte v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Borchers Bros. v. Buckeye Incubator Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DEPARTMENT OF INDUS. REL. v. Fidelity Roof Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Showplace Square Loft Co. v. Primecore Mortgage Trust, Inc. (In Re Showplace Square Loft Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2003
- Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. CarawayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- L.A. Unified School Dist. v. Torres Construction Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Los Angeles Unified etc. v. Torres Construction CA2/8California Court of Appeal · 2020