Legal Opinion

Rhodes, Pegram & Co. v. McCormick

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 1, 1857PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from the Muscatine District Court. In September, 1855, tbe plaintiffs brought their action against the defendants, and attached a certain half lot in the city of Muscatine, to satisfy any judgment they might recover. In June, 1856, they obtained judgment, with an order for a special execution against said half lot.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Muscatine District Court. In September, 1855, tbe plaintiffs brought their action against the defendants, and attached a certain half lot in the city of Muscatine, to satisfy any judgment they might recover. In June, 1856, they obtained judgment, with an order for a special execution against said half lot. In August afterwards, an execution accordingly issued, and as appears from the sheriff’s return, a disagreement arose between the plaintiffs and W. McCormick, (one of the defendants, and owner of the property,) the said owner claiming said premises as his homestead, and…

1Opinion of the Court

Wright, 0. J.[1]

The decision of this case involves the? construction of several provisions of chapter 81. of the Codé. These provisions are substantially as follows: The homestead must embrace the house used as a home by the owner thereof. It may contain one or more lots or tracts of land, with the buildings thereon, and other appurtenances; but if within a town plat, it must not exceed one half acre in extent If when thus limited, its value is less than five hundred dollars, it may be enlarged until it reaches' that value. It is not to embrace more than one dwelling-house, .nor any other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Charless v. LambersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Potter v. ClappIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Ashton v. IngleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  3. Gymnastic Ass'n of the South Side of Milwaukee v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Smith v. Guckenheimer & SonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
  5. Seiffert & Wiese Lumber Co. v. HartwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API