Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Morrissey

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1992No. C011114PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SPARKS, Acting P. J.

In this wrongful death/medical malpractice action we consider whether the trial court erred in refusing two special instructions, one concerning a physician’s duty to inform the patient of different schools of thought on the proposed surgery and the other dealing with the burden of proof. For the reasons which follow, we conclude that the trial court correctly refused the special instructions. We also consider and reject the argument that an expert witness was disqualified because of asserted bias.

Plaintiffs, the heirs of decedent Gordon Mathis, appeal from a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Arato v. AvedonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Sargent Fletcher, Inc. v. Able Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Morales v. 22nd District Agricultural Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Spann v. Irwin Memorial Blood CentersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. HOME BUILDERS ASSN. OF TULARE/KINGS COUNTIES, INC. v. City of LemooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API