Legal Opinion

Spann v. Irwin Memorial Blood Centers

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1995No. A063310; A063310PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, P. J.

In October of 1984 Sherrie Spann received an infusion of more than 130 units of blood plasma and platelets as treatment for a life-threatening blood disease known as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Although the treatment regimen was apparently successful, Ms. Spann contracted human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) from the infused blood products; she died in May of 1990 from complications due to acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS).

Ms. Spann’s husband, Douglas Spann, sued the Kaiser Foundation Hospital (Kaiser), the Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (Permanente),…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Howell v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood BankWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Blue Mountain Development Co. v. CarvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Arato v. AvedonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Howard v. Omni Hotels Management Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. N.N v. v. American Ass'n of Blood BanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Dole Citrus v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API