Legal Opinion

Arato v. Avedon

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1993No. S029049PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

A physician’s duty to disclose to a patient information material to the decision whether to undergo treatment is the central constituent of the legal doctrine known as “informed consent.” In this case, we review the ruling of a divided Court of Appeal that, in recommending a course of chemotherapy and radiation treatment to a patient suffering from a virulent form of cancer, the treating physicians breached their duty to obtain the patient’s informed consent by failing to disclose his statistical life expectancy.

As will appear, we conclude that the Court of Appeal erred in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Bullock v. Phillip Morris USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Hahn v. MirdaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Jambazian v. BordenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Coryell v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Hambrick v. Healthcare Partners Medical Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API