MARK K. v. Roman Catholic Archbishop
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MASTERSON, J.
We affirm judgments entered in nine consolidated actions following an order sustaining the demurrers of the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles, a corporation sole (hereafter the church), without leave to amend.
Standard of Review
In reviewing the sustaining of a demurrer, “we are guided by long-settled rules. ‘We treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions or conclusions of fact or law. [Citation.] We also consider matters which may be judicially noticed.’ [Citation.] Further, we give the complaint a reasonable…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Bernson v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Rita M. v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Norman Redwing v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Shively v. BozanichCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Quarry v. Doe ICalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Richelle L. v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.