Legal Opinion

Shively v. Bozanich

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 2003No. S094467PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

In this case we consider the application of the statute of limitations to a defamation case in which plaintiff first learned that she had been defamed after purchasing and reading a book that contained defamatory remarks about her, remarks that were attributed to persons other than the author of the book.

Ordinarily, a tort cause of action accrues and the limitations period commences when the injury occurs; for defamation this occurs, generally speaking, when the defendant communicates the defamatory statement to others. In some tort actions, the accrual of the cause of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Hartmann v. Time, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Baral v. SchnittCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Richard A. Canatella v. John K. Van De Kamp Marie M. Moffat Jay Goldman Nancy McCarthy California Bar Journal Robert Hawley Zanassi Martha DaetwylerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Love v. Associated Newspapers, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Overstock.com, Inc. v. Gradient Analytics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API