Legal Opinion

Rita M. v. Roman Catholic Archbishop

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1986No. B009259PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, J. *

I

Introduction

Plaintiffs/appellants appeal from an order of the Los Angeles County Superior Court, dated November 16, 1984, sustaining the demurrer of respondent, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles, a corporation, to plaintiffs’ second amended complaint without leave to amend. Although a judgment of dismissal was not entered until November 20, 1986, the appeal is deemed proper and timely filed by this court.

II

Facts

In appellants’ verified “second amended complaint for civil conspiracy; for negligence; for fraud and deceit; for professional malpractice deceit; and for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Ochoa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Baxter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Alma W. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Byrd v. FaberOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  3. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Moses v. Diocese of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. West Virginia Regional Jail & Correctional Facility Authority v. A.B.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2014

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API