Legal Opinion
In Re Personal Restraint of Erickson
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 2, 2008No. 60020-6-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
191 P.3d 917 (2008)
In re the PERSONAL RESTRAINT Petition of Kail Ernest ERICKSON, Petitioner.
No. 60020-6-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
September 2, 2008.
Nancy Collins, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Ronda Larson, Attorney General's Office/Criminal Justice Division, Olympia, WA, for Respondent.
COX, J.
¶ 1 In this personal restraint petition, Kail Erickson contends the Department of Corrections (DOC) failed to credit him for all "good time" to which he is legally entitled.[1] He bases his claim on the sentencing court's decision to credit him with "368…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Matter of Personal Restraint of CashawWashington Supreme Court · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of BovanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- In Re the Personal Restraint of TalleyWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Personal Restraint Petition Of Phillip Lamont AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Personal Restraint Petition Of Stephen P. Dowdney, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2026
- State Of Washington v. Anthony Russell WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013