Legal Opinion

Matter of Personal Restraint of Cashaw

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1994No. 59959-9PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Madsen J.

Charles Cashaw filed a personal restraint petition (PRP) challenging the actions of the Indeterminate Sentence Review Board (Board) in setting his minimum prison term to coincide with the remainder of his court-imposed maximum sentence. The Court of Appeals found the case to be moot but proceeded to address the merits in light of the important issues involved. The court granted the PRP after concluding the Board’s failure to follow its own procedural rules violated Cashaw’s due process rights.

Although we too reach the merits of the case, we find that no due process liberty interest…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. In Re IsadoreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re HintonWashington Supreme Court · 2004

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API