Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Bovan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 23, 2010No. 62983-2-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

¶1 Primarily at issue in this personal restraint petition is whether the state Department of Corrections (DOC) correctly denied Anthony Bovan credit on the remaining portion of his prison sentence following revocation of his release to community custody. Bovan’s petition is technically moot. But we address this issue because of its continuing and substantial public importance. It is also otherwise likely to evade review.

¶2 We hold that Bovan was entitled to credit on the remaining portion of his sentence for all periods he actually spent in detention awaiting disposition of alleged violations…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. DelgadoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. TiliWashington Supreme Court · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Canal Station North Condominium Ass'n v. Ballard Leary Phase II, LPCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Top Line Builders, Inc. v. BovenkampCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. State Of Washington, V. Joseph Allen ShreveCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  4. Canal Station Condominium Assn, Resp. v. Ballard Leary Phase Ii, Lp, Et Ano.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Personal Restraint Petition Of Phillip Lamont AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API