In Re the Personal Restraint of Talley
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJ.M. Johnson, J.
¶1 The primary issue presented in this case is whether former RCW 9.92.151 (2004) or the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution requires a county jail to provide opportunities for an inmate who is yet to be sentenced to earn credit toward early release, also known as “good-time” credit.
¶2 The petitioner, Teddy Glen Talley, argues that the Skamania County Jail and the Department of Corrections (Department) violated former RCW 9.92.151(1) and the Constitution by not providing opportunities for him to earn good-time credit before his criminal conviction. He further contends…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- City of Redmond v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Washington v. George Dean BartzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019