Legal Opinion

State v. Broadaway

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1997No. 64654-6PublishedCited by 217 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

— Defendant challenges the constitutionality of Initiative 159, "Hard Time for Armed Crime,” claiming that it does not satisfy the title and single subject requirements of article II, section 19 of the state constitution. In his pro se brief, he also challenges admissibility of his confession, and part of the judgment and sentence. We affirm the conviction, but remand for resentencing.

Defendant Nathaniel R. Broadaway was convicted of first degree robbery committed while armed with a deadly *121weapon. On September 23, 1995, Broadaway went to the Island Crossing Texaco and placed a note on the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by217 opinions

  1. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. BroadawayWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1998

212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API