State v. Broadaway
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
942 P.2d 363 (1997)
133 Wash.2d 118
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Nathaniel R. BROADAWAY, Appellant.
No. 64654-6.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued February 26, 1997.
Decided August 21, 1997.
Nielsen, Broman & Associates, Eric Nielsen, Eric Broman and Jonathan T. Stier, Seattle, for appellant.
Jim Krider, Snohomish County Prosecutor and Aaron Fine, Deputy County Prosecutor, Everett, for respondent.
MADSEN, Justice.
Defendant challenges the constitutionality of Initiative 159, "Hard Time for Armed Crime," claiming that it does not satisfy the title and single subject requirements of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by213 opinions
- State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. Houston-SconiersWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- In the Matter of CharlesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
208 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.