Anderson Carriage Co. v. Pungs
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by the Anderson Carriage Company against William A. Pungs for money had and received. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
In February, 1897, two corporations-were in existence in Detroit, the one known as the Anderson Manufacturing Company, and the other as the American Railway Supply Company. By an agreement between the officers of the two corporations, a new corporation was organized, known as the Pungs-Anderson Manufacturing Company; the corporation being instituted for the purpose of absorbing the two first-named corporations. The assets of each of said companies were transferred to the new corporation, and, in payment for the same, stock in the Pungs-Anderson Company was issued to the respective holders of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Emerson v. Detroit Steel & Spring Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Teachout v. Van HoesenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Bedier v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Hallett v. GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Bedier v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barbour v. HurlburtMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Billig v. GoodrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Doyle v. PeltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Weidman v. WillsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908