Emerson v. Detroit Steel & Spring Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeals from Wayne. (Iiosmer, J.) Argued February 18, 1894. Decided April 17, 1894. Bills to set aside attachments. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The complainants were, after the making of a common-law assignment by the George T. Smith Middlings Purifier' Company, appointed by the circuit court in chancery to act as receivers for the assigned estate, and in that capacity filed two several bills against the two defendants named, askiug to have attachments which had been sued out by the defendants herein against the property of the purifier company set aside, upon the grounds- — -First, that the proceedings were so irregular as to render the attachments invalid; and, second, that there existed no sufficient ground for suing out an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Barber v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Boarman v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1843
- Galloway v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1844
- Hale v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
- Rowe v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Davis v. Louisville Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Investors Royalty Co., Inc. v. Market Trend Survey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Dime Savings Bank v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Bedier v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Hallett v. GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.