Billig v. Goodrich
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Withey, J., presiding. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Adolph Billig against Joseph P. Goodrich and another for money had and received. There was judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
In justice’s court plaintiff declared orally “in an action of assumpsit on all the common counts, especially on a written contract, claims damages $500 or under, and waives tort. The defendants pleaded the general issue.” This from the return on appeal. The items of plaintiff’s demand, according to a bill of particulars, are:
To sum paid in purchase price of lots 195, 196, and 206 of block 0 of Ojihway Park subdivision $275.00
Expenses in going to and from the property.. 200.00
$475.00
Interest ......................................
A more particular bill was asked for, and not furnished. With the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Silfver v. DaenzerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Angell v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Fitzpatrick v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Burchy v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Janiszewski v. BehrmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Lackovic v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Kristoffy v. IwanskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Janiszewski v. BehrmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1956