Weidman v. Willson
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Shiawassee; Miner, J. Assumpsit by Frank Weidmart against Purvis S. Will-son for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court; and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This action originated in justice’s ' court. The declaration was on the common counts in assumpsit and specifically for the use of water in the building now occupied by defendant. The defendant recovered in the justice’s court, the plaintiff appealed to the circuit court, and on the trial of the case, at the conclusion of the testimony, the circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff brings error.
It appeared on the trial that the defendant had the right to possession of certain rooms in a building, the occupancy of other portions of which were in the plaintiff, and that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tuttle v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Watson v. SteverMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Grinnell v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Anderson Carriage Co. v. PungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Barbour v. HurlburtMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. HaightMichigan Supreme Court · 1915