Legal Opinion

Hallett v. Gordon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Livingston; Smith, J. Assumpsit by Jennie Hallett against Thomas Gordon, Jr., for fraud and deceit. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This case has been in this court once before, and is reported in 122 Mich. 567 (81 N. W. 556). In an opinion by Hooker, J., it was held the contract sued upon was void under the statute of frauds; that the action being assumpsit for the breach of an alleged warranty, and no contract relations ever having existed between the parties to the record, the defendant could not be sued in this form of action, but plaintiff’s only remedy, if any, against this defendant, was an action on the case *365for the alleged fraud and deceit. Judgment having passed for the plaintiff below, it was reversed, and no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Emerson v. Detroit Steel & Spring Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hallett v. GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Bedier v. FullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Citizens' State Bank v. McGraft Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mintz v. JacobMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Rutan v. StraehlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. First National Bank v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Hogle v. MeyeringMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Washburn v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API