Legal Opinion

Unemployment Compensation Com. v. . Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1939PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEAWELL, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

2Concurring in part, dissenting in partSchenck, J.

This is a civil action to recover alleged contributions due the unemployment compensation fund upon the commissions paid by defendant to its soliciting agents and its managers in their capacity as soliciting agents. Upon specific waiver of a jury, the judge found the facts.

To the following findings of fact there were no objections or exceptions: That defendant is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Winston-Salem but has never availed itself of this source of credit, nor has it ever discharged any functions or duties…

3Cases cited22 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by58 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Creameries of America, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Waterbury Savings Bank v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  4. A. J. Meyer & Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Rozran v. DurkinIllinois Supreme Court · 1942

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API