Legal Opinion

Rozran v. Durkin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1942No. 26415. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fulton

Sherman H. Kuehl filed his claim for unemployment compensation with the Department of Labor under the provisions of the Illinois Unemployment Compensation Act, alleging that he was in the employ of the Cannonball Bonded Messenger Service for the period from January 9, 1939, to June 1, 1939, and had earned $378.78 in net wages earned during this period.

The facts show that the Cannonball Bonded Messenger Service was a partnership organization in the general pickup and delivery service. Kuehl made deliveries for Cannonball under an oral agreement by which terms he was to receive 65 per cent of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  2. Creameries of America, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Fuller Brush Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Unemployment Compensation Com. v. . Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Unemployment Compensation Commission v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. AFM Messenger Service, Inc. v. Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Carpetland U.S.A., Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Krebs v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Zelney v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Lindley v. MurphyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API