Legal Opinion

Metcalf & Eddy v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 11, 1926No. 183 and 376PublishedCited by 563 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

Metcalf & Eddy, the plaintiffs below, were consulting •engineers.who, either individually or as co-partners, were professionally employed to advise states or subdivisions of states with reference to proposed water supply and sewage disposal systems. . During 1917 the fees received by them for these services-were paid over to the firm and became a part of its gross income. Upon this portion of their net income they paid, under protest, the tax assessed on the net income of co-partnerships under the War Revenue Act of 1917 (Act. of October 3, 1917, c. 63, § 209, 40 Stat. 300, 307). They then…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by563 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937

558 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API