Legal Opinion
A. J. Meyer & Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided April 18, 1941PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
January 2, 1939, William F. Metz filed with the Unemployment Compensation Commission a claim for unemployment compensation. It was Metz's contention that as a real estate salesman he had beenin the employment of A.J. Meyer Company, a St. Louis real estate firm, within the meaning of our Unemployment Compensation Act, Laws 1937, p. 574 et seq., Sec. 9421 et seq., R.S. 1939, and was entitled to such compensation. Meyer Company resisted the claim; contended that Metz, as to it, was an independent contractor; that the relation of employer and employee did not exist, and that such being so, Metz…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Steward MacHine Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Glaser v. RothschildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Industrial Commission v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
- Fuller Brush Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1940
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Haynes v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Citizens Bank of Shelbyville v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Singer Sewing MacH. Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Meyer v. Industrial Comm. of Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1949
- Goldberg v. Administrative Hearing CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.