Hale v. Independent Powder Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Cow>% Ottawa County; •Preston S. Dmis, Judge. Action by the Independent Powder Company against C. L. Hale and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Hale brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
ROBBERTS, O.
This action was commenced in the district court of Ottawa county by the defendant in error, hereinafter designated as plaintiff, against C. L. Hale, C. P. Farrow, H. L. Marshal, and A. S. Hadley, partners doing business under the firm name and style of Swastika Mining Company, to recover the sum of $579.35, on open account for goods and merchandise, sold and delivered. Defendants C. L. Hale and C. P. Farrow answered by general denial, and also a special denial as to the existence of partnership between said parties, verified. There seems to have been no appearance as to defendants…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weisbender v. School Dist. No. 6 of Caddo CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Clay v. Hildebrand Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1886
- Vaught v. Miners' Bank of JoplinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Board of Com'rs of Beaver County v. LangstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moore v. HarjoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Harjo v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Russell v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Kelsey v. Dollarsaver Food Warehouse of DurantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Mortimer v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1943