Mortimer v. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co.
Nevada Supreme Court
1DissentTaber, J.
There is no controversy concerning the $2,000 allowed appellant for his services performed in the year 1940. The order making that allowance was final, and in, full for appellant’s services from the date of his appointment May 10, 1940, to and including December of the same year.
There is a difference of opinion regarding the order allowing appellant $3,000 for his services performed in 1941. Plaintiff and the present receiver contend that the trial court was right in holding that said order, like that of 1940, was final, and that said allowance was in full for the year 1941. This contention…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- McFadden v. McFaddenArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Watson v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Quigley v. McIntoshMontana Supreme Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Booth v. Beck Jewelry Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Gottwals v. RencherNevada Supreme Court · 1939
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.