Legal Opinion

Weisbender v. School Dist. No. 6 of Caddo County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 13, 1909No. 139PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error from District Court, Caddo County; F. E. Gillette, Judge. Action by Jacob Weisbender, Frank Noll, John Smith, and the Stephenson-Browne Lumber Company against School District No. 6 of Caddo County. There was a judgment for all the plaintiffs, and plaintiffs Weisbender, Noll, and Smith bring- error.

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

On October 5, 1904, the plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, filed their action against the defendant in error, defendant below, to recover a judgment against it in the sum of $2,671.75. On the trial of the cause to the court, it was found that there was due from the school district to plaintiffs the amount prayed, but that all of the said amount except the sum of $893 was in excess of 4 per cent, of the assessed valuation of said district. A judgment was rendered in favor of all the plaintiffs, and against the defendant school district, for this sum with a proviso that the same be applied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wedd v. GatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Humphrey v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Strange v. CrismonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. City of Sapulpa v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Am. Nat. Bank of McAlester v. Mergenthaler LinotypeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Kansas City, M. & O. Ry. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Bowels v. CooneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Hughes v. RhodesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API