Legal Opinion

Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. Hall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 3, 1914No. 4547PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Carter County; S. H. Russell, Judge. Action by C. P. Hall against Appleton, Braziel, and Landrum, as principals, and the Southwestern Surety & Insurance Company, as surety. From a judgment for plaintiff, the Surety Company brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

On July 3, 1911, in the district court of Carter county, C. P. Hall, defendant in error, sued Appleton, Braziel, and Landrum, as principals, and the Southwestern Surety & Insurance Company, plaintiff in error, as surety, upon their respective official bonds, alleging false imprisonment as a breach thereof, and his damage $6,000. There were two verdicts, one in favor of Landrum and said company, as surety on his bond, and the other in favor of plaintiff and against Appleton for $100, and against Braziel for $150, but nothing was said in the verdict concerning said company as surety aforesaid.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. National Surety Co. v. Oklahoma Presbyterian College for GirlsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Vaught v. Miners' Bank of JoplinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Chickasha Light, Heat & Power Co. v. BezdicheckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Bonebrake v. Ætna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Strawn v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Butler v. ChateauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Hale v. Independent Powder Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. International Filter Co. v. Conroe Gin, Ice & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API