Legal Opinion

Adams v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 12, 1990No. 55-89CPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RADER, Judge.

The 66 named plaintiffs allege that the Central Intelligence Agency (the CIA) took their private property for public use. Plaintiffs delivered money to an investment banking firm purportedly operated or maintained by the CIA. Thus, plaintiffs contend that the CIA used their money to fund intelligence activities. According to plaintiffs, negligent operation or supervision of the investment firm by the CIA proximately caused the firm’s insolvency and the consequent loss of plaintiffs’ investments.

Defendant now moves for summary judgment. Specifically, defendant contends that…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. Board of Regents of the University of Texas System, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
  2. Woodson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Skillo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Anderson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  5. Buser v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API