Legal Opinion
Anderson v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 14, 1990No. 90-569CPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*179ORDER
LYDON, Senior Judge.
In this military pay case,1 plaintiff, proceeding pro se, seeks reinstatement to active duty, back pay and allowances, and damages2 on the grounds the Department of the Air Force improperly refused to reenlist him after the expiration of his term of enlistment. Defendant has moved to dismiss plaintiffs complaint contending the court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the claim set forth in the complaint. Plaintiff opposes defendant’s motion to dismiss. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. Based on the submissions of the parties, oral argument being deemed…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Smithkline Diagnostics, Inc. v. Helena Laboratories Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Pikulin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Charles v. Rice, Secretary USAFCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Marlin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Treviño v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.