Skillo v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court are plaintiffs’ Complaint (Compl.), Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Def.’s Mot. or Motion), plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Pl.’s Resp. or Response), and Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Def.’s Reply or Reply). Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), defendant moves to dismiss the claims in plaintiffs’ Complaint “because this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider those claims.” Def.’s Mot. at 1. For the following reasons,…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- McCullough v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Gray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Edelmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.