Automatic Washer Co. v. Easy Washing MacHine Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BRENNAN, Chief Judge.
The complaint on its face sets forth a claim for relief based upon trade-mark infringement. It is alleged that the action arises under the Trade-Mark Laws of the United States and charges in substance that the use by the defendant of the designation “Spindrier” is a colorable imitation of plaintiff’s registered trade-mark “Spin-dry”, and an infringement thereof as applied by the defendant to its washing machines or laundry equipment. The plaintiff seeks an injunction, an accounting of profits, and treble damages.
The answer denies infringement, ownership by the plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Best & Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Hanson v. Triangle Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Norwich Pharmacal Company v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Ralston Purina Company v. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Eldon Industries, Inc. v. Rubbermaid, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Aktienge-Sellschaft v. DreerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- United States Blind Stitch MacHine Corp. v. Union Special MacHine Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.