Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reed
The Nu-Enamel Corporation of Illinois filed its bill of complaint in a District Court of the United States in Illinois to enjoin the Armstrong Paint and Varnish Works, a corporation of the same State, from using in the sale of paints, varnishes and similar goods the words “Nu-Beauty Enamel” or any name including the words “Nu-Enamel” or other colorable imitation of plaintiff’s registered trade-mark Nu-Enamel or otherwise infringing it; to require an accounting of profits, and to recover treble damages. Pending the litigation, the plaintiff sold its assets to the other respondent, Nu-Enamel…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by414 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
409 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.