Legal Opinion

Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 7, 1901No. 121PublishedCited by 297 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. This was a bill filed in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois by the Elgin National Watch Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Illinois, having its principal place of business at Elgin and its office in Chicago, in that State, against the Illinois Watch Case Company, also a corporation of Illinois, with its principal place of business at Elgin,…

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. This was a bill filed in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois by the Elgin National Watch Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Illinois, having its principal place of business at Elgin and its office in Chicago, in that State, against the Illinois Watch Case Company, also a corporation of Illinois, with its principal place of business at Elgin, and certain other defendants, citizens of Illinois. The bill alleged: “.That prior to the 11th day of April, A. D.…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fullee

The Circuit Court of Appeals held that the bill must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The parties to the suit were all citizens of Illinois, and the court was of opinion that it could not be maintained under the act of March 3, 1881, c. 138, 21 Stat. 502.

In the Trade Mark Cases, 100 U. S. 82, this court held that the act of July 8, 1870, carried forward into sections 4937 to 4947 of the Revised Statutes, was void for want of constitutional authority, inasmuch as it was so framed that its provisions were applicable to all commerce, and could not be confined to that which was subject to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SteffensSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by297 opinions

  1. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. William R. Warner & Co. v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

292 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API