Legal Opinion

Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 3, 1927No. 22PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

The Postum Cereal Company and its predecessors in title have for years manufactured a cereal breakfast food to which they applied, as a trade-mark, the word “ Grape- Nuts,” for which they secured registrations under the Trade-Mark Registration Act of February 20, 1905 (38 Stat. .727) and amendments. They filed a petition of opposition to the registration , by the California Fig Nut Company of the trade-mark “ Fig-Nuts ” which that company had registered under the Act of March 19, 1920, § 1, par. b, 41 Stat. 533.

Séction 2 of the same Act provides that when any-person shall deem himself injured…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Shaffer v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Keller v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Liberty Warehouse Co. v. GrannisSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Federal Radio Comm'n v. Nelson Brothers Bond & Mortgage Co. (Station WIBO)Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API