Brach v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal, brought by taxpayer Ernesto Brach pro se, concerns his claim that the Internal Revenue Service (“the IRS”) promised to pay him a tax refund and his attempt to recover that amount on a contract theory. The Court of Federal Claims dismissed Mr. Brach’s case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Brack v. United States, 98 Fed.Cl. 60 (2011) [hereinafter Dismissal Opinion ]. We disagree that the Court of Federal Claims lacked subject matter jurisdiction, but nevertheless affirm because Mr. Brach failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
I
Mr.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Three S Consulting v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Diamond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Cooper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Mendez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Heger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.